USA should Begin Withdrawing Troops from Iraq Essay Example for Free

USA should Begin Withdrawing Troops from Iraq EssayWar in Iraq affects many countries, their social and economic situation, governmental stability and world-wide relations. A question of the American host presence in Iraq is one of the most controversial issues in political practice. During years of heated discussions, society has tested to solve the ethical, philosophical and political dilemma concerning the war on terror and aggression of American government once against Iraqi people.America should withdraw troops from Iraq because its military presence and occupation contradicts Inter res publicaal Law (Hewitt, 2002). The example of the Iraqi war illustrates the fact that the problems of conflicts and violence are non carried out at a distance, against anon. and invisible victims, but in immediate physical confrontations with them. A nonher argument is that there is the increasing violence in Iraq against the US military. Following Jeffrey Sachs Were learning again that America cannot be an occupying force in the Middle East (Web Forum Was It Worth It?, 2006).Another reason against the military presence of the USA in Iraq is that primeval justification for the war against terror and military intervention in Iraq (weapons of mass destruction) is false. The main consequence was a shift of U.S. policy from peaceful neutrality to vulturine international policy supported by military strength. It would serve as an example of Washingtons repeated difficulty in winning guerrilla conflicts (U.S. Faces Pressure 2005).In addition, the US should withdraws troops from Iraq because the short-term consequences of its presence include increasing budget spending on military sector and warrantor programs, temporal stability and security of the American nation. Nevertheless, the war can create more terrorism affected innocent people around the world. The complications are that in a globalizing world, rich countries cannot sequester themselves from insecurity. Po verty and weak institutions are breeding grounds for public-health crises, violence, and economic volatility.Taking into account the opposite view, it is possible to say that if the USA withdraws troops form Iraq it willing threaten its national security and defense. Also, many politicians suppose that the US should implement its long-term policies aimed to strengthen democracy and weakened terrorist groups in this region. Today, Iraqi army is not strong enough to oppose terrorist groups and maintain peace in the region.Republicans, warned that withdrawing U.S. troops before the Iraqi army is fully prepared to defend the country against an balky insurgency would lead to more violence and possible civil war (Tate, 2006). In this case, it is evident that the US military presence in Iraq is important to strong stable political situation in the region. There seems to be general agreement that competition for political power and the material resources to which such power gives portal is a general explanation of the phenomena discussed in the paper.Democratic processes that aim to empower the populace with the final authority see the problem as a backsheesh down solution.No doubt that in modern society the main role is featured to democracy and the US presence supports democratic processes in Iraq. The re-organization of the political system should be mentioned here. Also, a civil war could spill over into the rest of the region and threaten the worlds energy supplies, a development that would damage the economies of altogether oil-dependent countries (U.S. Faces Pressure 2005).In this situation, the purpose of US forces is to maintain the continuity of the borders while introducing a degree of regional and local autonomy. In spite of democratic changes and political stability in Iraq, the threat is real and its all the more lethal because, paradoxically or not, its driven by religion and nihilism and a civilizations very(prenominal) unhappy encounter with m odernity (Web Forum, 2006). In this case, the US military is a force which ensures political stability and security for civil population.I suppose that the US should not withdraw troops from Iraq because US forces and control ensures political stability for both Iraq and the US nation. Every nation has the right to go to war in order to sustain its unity, to abolish poor governance, to re-organize the existing political institution if they violate national rights and self-determination. The war on terror and the problem of terrorism has not been yet, and it requires special measures to be made in order to ensure global peace and political stability.From the point of view of the USA, it is a necessary step to entertain its citizen from adverse intervention by a nation intending to use weapons of mass destruction. The major public concern is atomic war and its consequences for the globe. Efforts to control these activities through investigations and watch on the part of the law-enfo rcement community also illustrate positive measures to counter the threat of terrorism. Military aid to the civil power is a measure on hand(predicate) to the Iraqi government in extraordinary circumstances. The US military do whatever we have to do to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan and use the military power of the U.S. to do that (Burns, 2006).It is important to note that the war in Iraq is aimed to protect civil population from the authoritarian government and its attempts to control natural resources. There is no question that Iraq is an important, if not the most important, theater in terms of the fight against Al Qaeda (Johnson, 2006).Terrorism on the Middle East is an international problem for many countries including Israel and Palestine, the US and European countries.Thus, the initiation and implementation of measures in response to the threat of terrorism are often complex matters. The problems are magnified when international diplomatic conventions and considerations mol diness also be taken into account. The main means to fight terrorism include firm oppositeness to terrorism in all its forms and wherever it takes place, and opposition to domestic and international terrorism and respond to terrorist acts. The US mission in Iraq is to ensure global peace and control over the region and its terror groups.ReferencesBurns, R. (2006). Pentagon Faces snarly Choices on Iraq. USNews and World Report. Sept 20, Retrieved from http//hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=DCUSNSECTION=TOP_STORIESTEMPLATE=DEFAULTJohnson, S. (2006). We Are Where We Are Newsweek. Aug. 14. Retrieved from http//www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14349435/site/newsweek/3. Hewitt, Ch. (2002). Understanding Terrorism in America From the Klan to Al Qaeda. Routledge.Tate, D. (2006). US Senate Rejects Proposals to Withdraw Troops From Iraq. June 22. Retrieved from http//voanews.com/english/archive/2006-06/2006-06-22-voa50.cfm?CFID=38746764CFTOKEN=55075176S. Faces Pressure to Pull Troops from I raq. (2005). Retrieved from http//www.pinr.com/report.php?ac=view_reportreport_id=328language_id=1Web Forum Was It Worth It? (2006) Tuesday, Mar. 21. Retrieved from http//www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1175256,00.html