A Double Standard in “A Doll’s House” Essay

In todays society, all are taught the social structure that is meant to be followed and not changed yet, are also taught to have a bun in the oven up for something if enough belief is put into it- a double archetype by most accounts. Such standards exist in the die hard A Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen. Set in the term where womens equality was a joke and with an ending too imposing for the German public, this play brought into light the two kinds of spiritual law 1 in man one in women (Rosefeldt) this view bug outlines the distinct standards held for all(prenominal) gender that quarter be agnisen throughout different works of literary productions and even in todays society. Rosefeldt emphasizes Ibsens view that this public is exclusively a male societywith prosecutors and judges who judge womens behavior from the male standpoint. (Rosefeldt) From this, it can be hold that such a standard exists.Looking back on literature, many unique examples can be found. In the epic, Th e Odyssey, Odysseuss wife, Penelope, is remains faithful to her husband, of which has been gone for twenty years. Just in the act of being faithful lends to the fact that she was mechanically expected to by her peers. No matter how much suffering, she was pacify to go with the social norm and wait. In stark contrast, Odysseus was presented with many chances of infidelity (the Sirens & Calypso) as the gods pressed obstacles in the personal manner of his journey home. Despite the gods attempts, Odysseuss protest morals prevented the expected to occur. From this view, the story directly contradicts itself in regards to gender standards. amid the non-chalant attitude towards Odysseus if he were to cheat and the Penelope must al slipway lenify faithful under and circumstance perspective, it is implied that women are not at the like liberties as men when put in the same situation.In the play itself, the double standards set amid Nora and her overly-dominant husband, Torvald, can b e clearly seen. many an(prenominal) times throughout the play, Nora is referred to as a bird or squirrel as Torvald is always called by his name, implying that their relationship is an overly-close bond (Rosefeldt) with Torvald in charge. As Nora struggles with her abstruse transaction throughout the play, she deeply ponders leaving Torvald and her family or even killing herself. Her deep consideration bluntly differs Torvalds instantaneous decision to enamor rid of her as soon as he found out about her under-the-table loan.Greatly improved from the times this play was written, women arent property and most have their own jobs and careers. Even with their jobs though, women are still expected to be the homemaker. Throughout history, women have always been seen as the child-bearing counterparts to their bread-winning husbands-just construe at any classic American sitcom. Although, much in those ways have changed in the past few decades, modern sports still check the standard t o a degree. Cheerleading, previously thought to be an exclusively fille sport, is increasingly growing popularity as a unisex sport. On the contrary, seldom is a girl seen playing football rather rare to see a girl playing on a team other than in a pee-wee league or a backyard family game.In the end, whether agreed or not, in that location is, in fact, a double standard between men and women- though some subtle, these age-old and well-known lines arent and plausibly wont be getting crossed anytime soon. Either way you look at it, one simple question sums it perfectly would there be a story if it were Torvald who had borrowed the money?